Claim reviewHow a future update should be checked
Every future edit should ask four questions. Is the claim still visible on the live Steam page, Steam API, official publisher channel, Workshop page, or current gameplay check? Is the claim stable enough for a general guide, or is it tied to one patch, one custom map, one host setting, or one region? Does the claim help a player complete a task, such as buying safely, joining a room, understanding roles, or improving disguise? Could the same page answer the question with a safer checklist instead of an unsupported exact statement?
This matters because a young game guide can easily become lower quality by trying to sound complete too early. Exact map lists, hidden mechanics, permanent player limits, or specific UI button paths should not be treated as permanent unless current evidence supports them. If evidence is weak, the public page should say what to verify and where to verify it. That policy is less flashy than a fake complete guide, but it protects players from bad downloads, outdated Workshop claims, and confident strategy pages that cannot survive the next update.
The source log therefore acts as a boundary, not decoration. It tells readers why the guide is cautious and tells future editors what must be rechecked before expanding the site.